Forum Alvasoft.net
accueil
s'inscrire
aide
recherche
Répondre au sujet
Pseudo
Mot de passe
Vous avez oublié votre mot de passe ?
Message
[quote=geemong][b]EU Commission to make it easier to sue over AI products[/b] [url=https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/7E82/production/_126868323_gettyimages-1239386581.jpg] The European Commission has proposed new rules to help people harmed by products using artificial intelligence (AI) and digital devices like drones. Playing every online [url=https://xo-wallet.com/login-auto/]xo auto[/url] game from SLOTXO, the most important thing you need to focus on is access to bonus games. The more often you get in. Making money will be easier. The AI Liability Directive would reduce the burden of proof on people suing over incidents involving such items. Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders said it would make a legal framework that was fit for the digital age. Self-driving cars, voice assistants and search engines could all fall under the directive's scope. If passed, the Commission's rules could run alongside the EU's proposed Artificial Intelligence Act - the first law of its kind to set limits on how and when AI systems can be used. Artificial intelligence systems are trained on large amounts of data or information to allow machines to perform tasks which would typically be considered a matter of human intelligence. The AI Liability Directive, published by the European Commission on Wednesday, will introduce a "presumption of causality" for those claiming injuries by AI-enabled products. This means victims will not have to untangle complicated AI systems to prove their case, so long as a causal link to a product's AI performance and the associated harm can be shown. For a long time, social media firms have hidden behind the caveat that they are merely platforms for other people's stuff and therefore not responsible for the content of it. The EU does not want to repeat this scenario, with companies which make drones, for example, getting off the hook if they cause harm just because the firm itself wasn't directly behind the controllers. If your product is set up to be able to cause distress or damage, then you need to take responsibility if it does, is the clear message - and perhaps one which is overdue. Is this unduly harsh on a comparatively new industry? If a car crashes because of the mechanics inside the vehicle, that's down to the manufacturer. But the behaviour of the driver is not. Should this draft go through, all eyes will be on the first test case. Europe continues to chase the tail of big tech with big regulation - but is it being realistic here?[/quote]
autres
Mise en forme :
Noir
Rouge foncé
Rouge
Orange
Marron
Jaune
Vert
Olive
Cyan
Bleu
Bleu foncé
Indigo
Violet
Powered by
Phedio
v3.6 © dew
Contacter l'administrateur
- 4.4 ms